- contact@verticalserve.com
- Part of the Insight broker suite — InsightDealDesk · InsightDueDiligence
Nine agents read the target’s data room and what InsightPulse knows about it, reason over it with Claude and prepare the findings and the report. The engines compute every figure; every finding cites its page. Nothing reaches the buyer until a broker has reviewed it.
Illustrative: figures from the fictional demo book shown on this site. Your engagements will differ.


What every engagement answers
The running product on a fictional industrial target. The agents’ text is what Claude wrote; every figure is the engines’. Click a screen for the full page.

Nine policies across nine lines and $1.27M of premium, each read from the schedule and the declarations with its page. Three lines are claims-made; four sit on the seller’s master program.
Those are the lines that change at closing — so they are flagged before anyone builds a spreadsheet.
An industrial target on its parent’s program
21 claims, $1.26M incurred, nine still open and frequency up 13% — by line and year, every claim read from the loss runs.
The loss run agent explains the trend; it never computes the numbers it explains.
The model explains, the engine counts
A $2.4M product liability demand, cited to the litigation letter; the same suit in the news, cited to InsightPulse with its as-of date. A broker approves, changes or rejects each one — only reviewed findings reach the report.
What InsightPulse knows about the targetForty documents and three weeks. The hours go into copying limits into a spreadsheet; what hurts the buyer after closing is in the declarations, the conditions and the hierarchy.
D&O, E&O, cyber and EPL end or convert at closing. A claim next year for an act last year finds no policy.
Lines on the seller’s master program end at closing, and the standalone price is a number nobody modelled.
The hierarchy has an operating subsidiary that no policy names, sometimes in another country.
The R&W team reads the report as a PDF; nobody can say which finding became which exclusion.
A workspace per engagement, nine agents that prepare the work, and the controls that hold the report until a person signs.
Schedules, declarations and loss runs read into fields, each with its page.
Learn moreFrequency and severity by line and year, open reserves and the losses above the limit.
Learn moreMissing lines and thin limits against the practice’s benchmark for the sector and size.
Learn moreClaims-made cover that stops at closing, and the clauses that act on a sale, quoted.
Learn moreInsightPulse’s hierarchy and news, checked against the named insureds.
Learn moreThe standalone premium and one-time tails, on the practice’s assumptions.
Learn moreA report from reviewed findings only, and a signed hand-off to InsightDealDesk.
Learn moreEngagement controls written as sentences, and a signed record of every review.
Learn moreOne target’s program against a 25-question playbook. Every step after Analyze is something a broker can open and check.
The data room into page-level pieces (InsightXtract in production); InsightPulse for the company and its hierarchy.
Premium, claims by line and year, gaps against the benchmark, tails, the cost after closing.
With Claude, over their cited facts, and prepare findings and decisions.
A number not in the facts throws the answer away; the check’s own finding stands.
Approve, change or reject each finding against its page. Controls hold the report while high findings wait.
Built from reviewed findings only; R&W-relevant ones go, signed, to InsightDealDesk.
The hero says where the engagement stands — Scoping, Data room, Analysis, Review, Report, Delivered. Below it, seven zones: Findings, Program, Loss runs, Gaps & recommendations, Target 360, Documents and Report.






The first seven work the playbook; each finds the facts with a check, then reasons over them with Claude. Four actions exist, and every one is capped at ask first, whatever the dial says.
The checklist: policies, five years of loss runs, contracts, a litigation letter.
Prepares the seller requestEvery policy into the program: lines, carriers, limits, retentions, premiums, triggers, structure.
The program against the practice’s benchmark for the sector and size: missing lines, thin limits.
Frequency and severity by line and year, open reserves, large losses, the trend.
Claims-made tails, the sellers’ D&O run-off, change-of-control clauses.
InsightPulse’s hierarchy against the named insureds; company, industry, leadership.
Litigation, environmental, product and warranty exposure, and whether the program responds.
The program after closing; the report from reviewed findings.
Prepares delivery & the hand-offRuns the engagement controls; writes the practice leader’s brief.
Prepares sign-off; never decidesAnswers questions about the engagement from eight read-only tools, with numbered sources. Never acts.
The level for any action is the lowest of three: the agent’s level, the action’s hard cap and the practice’s ceiling. The ceiling ships at L2.
The agent drafts; a person does the work. Where every action starts.
The agent prepares the decision; a broker accepts, changes, rejects or asks.
Acts, tells the person and lets them pull it back.
Acts on its own — only if the practice raises the ceiling.




The copilot answers from eight read-only tools on the engagement in front of you — overview, program, claims, findings, gaps, Target 360, data room search and the cost after closing — and says what the record does not hold.

High findings unreviewed (block), loss runs shorter than five years (warn), claims-made cover with no tail planned and due within a week with gaps open (refer) — written, tested on a real engagement and versioned.
Every control run, finding review and answer to a prepared decision, with who signed it. Runs are appended, never overwritten.
No Analysis without documents, no Report with high findings pending, no Delivered without a final report and with a blocking control firing.

Company intelligence from InsightPulse and documents through InsightXtract in; reviewed findings out to the R&W placement in InsightDealDesk under a signed, versioned contract.
Six illustrative targets and a vendor review, followed from an empty data room to a delivered report.
Four lines on the seller's master program, a TCE plume and a product suit.
Three enterprise contracts promise more than the cyber policy can pay.
Read the data room, analyse the program, report and a person signs off.
No. Asking the seller, delivering the report, sharing with the R&W placement and signing off are all capped at ask first. Outside production, sends are dry runs and nothing leaves the product.
The engines compute every figure; the model only reasons over them. Any number in a model answer that is not in the facts throws the answer away, and the check’s own finding stands.
The practice’s. The demo ships illustrative benchmarks by sector and revenue band, uplift by program structure and tail multiples; a practice replaces them with its own.
No. Without it the report stands alone and the hand-off is held. With it, reviewed findings reach the R&W placement as likely exclusions without re-typing.